To me, it's a matter of principles and empathy. Don't throw away rights you wouldn't like taken away from yourself, but then again, sadness can lead to acceptance of domination.
[hr]
Domination for others, always with a double standard. It's such spiteful rhetoric.
Re: The rise of the right
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 3:43 pm
by Socrates
This is an interesting thread that may be related. https://ontic-philosophy.com/Thread-Accelerationism
Re: The rise of the right
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2025 10:05 am
by kFoyauextlH
Added in 5 hours 42 minutes 38 seconds:
Added in 4 minutes 34 seconds:
Added in 20 minutes 52 seconds:
Added in 44 minutes 49 seconds:
Added in 19 hours 4 minutes 30 seconds:
Added in 7 minutes 53 seconds:
"
@aFoxyFox.
0 seconds ago
Under this video, the comments say don't blame the Father, under the video of the guy who was caught trying to do harm at Trump's golf course, people say his daughter should be jailed for caring about her father. I guess you're different people?
"
Added in 9 minutes 57 seconds:
"
In 2017 he changed his name to Fjotolf Hansen, Fjotolf being a name he created that is reminiscent of the word "fjott" (meaning fool).[6] In 2025 he changed his name to Far Skaldigrimmr Rauskjoldr av Northriki, which was described as a fantasy name loosely reminiscent of Old Norse. "Skaldigrimmr" is most similar to the real Old Norse or Icelandic nickname "Skalla-Grímr", meaning "bald Grímr", with "Rauskjoldr av Northriki" meaning "Red shield of the North".[347]
"
"
The green arrows point to the conjecture added by Larsson. Courtesy of Stephennie Mulder.
The final detail that puzzled Muldler is the composition of Larsson’s reconstruction drawing, in which she extends a conjecture of the patter past the silk band’s selvedge. “It’s like a ribbon with a finished edge on the top and bottom,” she said. “It would be impossible to argue that something had extended beyond the finished edge because the textile was designed to end at that point.”
"
That is so ridiculous, that such a story made the rounds. That is based on adding a shape at the end that wasn't present?
"
"The tablet-woven textile in the widely-dispersed press photograph shows only design of three uprights connected by a horizontal band," she wrote.
"But reconstruction drawing by textile archaeologist Annika Larsson shows extensions on either side that include a ha.
"These extensions practically double width of band. Not mentioned in press accounts: Larsson’s extensions are entirely conjectural."
Responding to the dispute, Ms Larsson told The Independent: "These finds are with no doubt from the Viking Age. They are found in several of the Birka graves and Viking Age boatgraves north of Gamla Uppsala. The geometrical Kufi is also to be found in similar textile ribbons from Spain.
"Even if the characters should be interpereted as “Illah” it is still Kufic, and as I have understood from the arabic experts it still refers to 'Allah'."
"
What the f*ck. It is just back and forth stupidity. All these people should end up in sealed "Viking Graves".
Added in 2 minutes 21 seconds:
Added in 8 minutes 59 seconds:
"
@metalboxman99
2 years ago (edited)
Tim's relentless talking over & cutting off of Fred this whole show is spot on... Its infuriating
696
19
@TNJX
2 years ago
isn't that a bad thing?
8
1
@metalboxman99
2 years ago (edited)
@TNJX It's hilarious.
28
@jenkemuser4636
2 years ago
He’s making fun of Bill Maher’s interviews
"
Added in 28 minutes 15 seconds:
"
@alexisrickman3066
5 days ago
I have no one to share this with
14
4
@name-fv4du
5 days ago
my exact situation
1
@eenzturano
4 days ago
Right I'm in a panic
@dogswithouthorses
4 days ago
me rn
"
Omg the cringe levels!
As if "the other side" isn't total trash themselves? They both are practically the same, horrible freaks who want the same things, just for their "team" especially.
Among these various groups, there is so much rottenness that they are very commonly racist and compromised, doesn't seem to matter if they are even "ethnic" or "colored", it is the Western "lingo" that has made all the factional "discourse" racist and deeply distorted before the first word is uttered.
Each group appears to the "everyman" who doesn't know what the hell is going on, to be a horrible kook.
"
@peterg76yt
4 years ago
I am reminded of a hyper-active immune response. Just as racism was disappearing, suddenly they see it everywhere, even if they have to create it themselves.
1
@paulkarch3318
4 years ago
There are inherent differences and they won't go away so this "problem" can only be solved in one way. Tribalism is good; our tribe is tired of supporting the other tribes.
"
So, in my opinion, the natural human response to all kinds of belligerent seeming f*cks yelling nonsense while carrying endless double standards and "moving goal posts", is to consider them all roughly "the same" and wanting nothing to do with any of them or their yapping. They seem like disgusting people, non-people, and really the feeling is that they should all drop-dead and be done with and silent forevermore. Natural causes preferably.
They have nothing to do with me, they are just a bunch of looney know nothings who are being manipulated by corporations mainly, and they are f*cked, there seems to be no way to get through to any of these people, just the way the enemies of humanity prefer it to seem, a huge wall between starkly divided people frothing at the mouth while ignoring serious issues. A total waste of time that drains me and makes me feel so "bored", like totally depleted even seeing their hideous hog-like appearances oinking and sending spittle flying everywhere, just f*cking get lost already.
"
Lourche was a French board game that was played in the 16th and 17th centuries.[1] It was played, like backgammon, on a tables board. The rules of the game have been lost, Furetière (1727) describing it simply as a "kind of trictrac game", trictrac being the name given to the board used for tables games.[2] The game is referred to in the English expression 'left in the lurch', parallel to the French demeurer lourche, referring to the hopeless losing position a player of the game could end up in.[3]
"
"
H.J.R. Murray simply records that 16th century works "often refer to a game of tables called lurch ... though none describes it."[5]
"
"
Yes,
alt-right trolling is widely described as a strategic, game-like tactic for spreading extremist ideas, using humor, irony, and shock to normalize hate, recruit vulnerable individuals, disrupt discourse, and gain attention, often blurring lines between trolling and genuine belief, leveraging platforms like Discord with connections to gaming culture. This "game" aims to make racist, misogynistic, and anti-semitic views seem acceptable through memes and provocative behavior, even if participants claim it's "just a joke" to mask hateful ideologies.
Key Aspects of Alt-Right Trolling:
Disinformation & Normalization: Trolling uses humor and memes to make extreme ideologies (like white nationalism) palatable and mainstream, according to research.
Recruitment Pipeline: Platforms like Discord, popular in gaming, facilitated alt-right organization, drawing in individuals with shared online histories, notes a YouTube video.
Strategic Ambiguity: Trolls use irony and plausible deniability ("it's just a meme") to challenge norms and avoid accountability, making it hard to discern sincere belief from trolling, say The Guardian and Taylor & Francis Online.
Psychological Motivation: Some trolls exhibit traits like sadism (enjoying others' distress) and Machiavellianism (manipulation), finding pleasure in upsetting people and disrupting conversations, notes ScienceDirect.com and a YouTube video.
Blurring Lines: The boundary between performative trolling and genuine extremist belief has collapsed, with actions like doxxing and threats sometimes stemming from these online spaces, according to FirstMonday.org.
In essence, for many, it's a deliberate, strategic "game" to push racist, misogynistic, and extremist agendas under the guise of irony and online disruption, notes CRIAW and The Guardian.
"
"
lurch
A player is 'lurched' or 'in the lurch' in card games like Cribbage, Saunt or Cassino if they not only lose but fail to score a minimum number of points, typically half of a winning score. Being in the lurch typically costs double. Similar to schneider.[76][75]
"
"
Antron Singleton Sr. (born September 15, 1976), better known by his stage name Big Lurch, is an American rapper and poet. He is serving a life sentence for murdering 21-year-old roommate Tynisha Ysais and eating parts of her body in April 2002. He was a member of the group Cosmic Slop Shop.
"
"
The victim was found in her apartment at night by a friend.[8] Her chest had been torn open and a three-inch blade was found broken off in her scapula. Teeth marks were found on her face and on her lungs, which had been torn from her chest. The friend testified that Singleton was naked and covered in blood, standing on the street and staring at the sky.[8] A medical examination performed shortly after his capture found human flesh in his stomach that was not his own. The victim's boyfriend said he and the aspiring rapper used PCP the day before the murder took place.[8]
"
"
Singleton was interviewed for the 2011 documentary Rhyme and Punishment.[15]
"
"
Nixon Recommends Move to the Center—Rejects Rightist Extremism · Deploring that sort of political “cannibalism,” he warned the party to avoid another
"
There is a weird connection between "games", being in a losing position, betrayal by commanders, right wing extremism, and cannibalism, these things keep circling and weave with each other.
"
One of the most lurid allegations against Bokassa was that of cannibalism. Former President Dacko was called to the witness stand to testify that he had seen photographs of butchered bodies hanging in the cold-storage rooms of Bokassa's palace immediately after the 1979 coup.[49] Photographs apparently showing a fridge in the palace that contained the bodies of schoolchildren were also published in Paris Match magazine.[63] When the defence put up a reasonable doubt during the cross-examination of Dacko that he could not be positively sure if the photographs he had seen were of dead bodies to be used for consumption, Bokassa's former chef was called to testify that he had cooked human flesh stored in the walk-in freezers and served it to Bokassa on an occasional basis. The prosecution did not examine rumours that Bokassa had served some of the flesh of his victims to visiting foreign dignitaries.[64]
"
"
A repeatedly expressed motive for consuming one's enemies was hatred: by reducing them to edible matter that was then digested, one annihilated them, physically and symbolically, thus achieving the "ultimate revenge". In some regions, people also believed that a person's spirit would usually survive their physical body but that the spirit had to die too if the body was destroyed, so cannibalism was employed to achieve the total destruction that killing alone could not achieve.[48]
Enemies were not the only victims, however. Several reports indicate that kidnapped strangers or purchased slaves could be eaten too. In some areas, any lonely stranger was at risk of being kidnapped and either enslaved or else – especially if they were considered less valuable to sell – killed and consumed.[49][50] Oral accounts indicate that at the start of the 20th century, though the open slave trade was by then a thing of the past, "people were still being kidnapped and either killed and eaten or sold away or sacrificed to one god or the other." The victims were often playing children or lonely travellers.[51] In earlier times, when slavery was still an accepted institution, young children purchased from other regions were sometimes deliberately fattened, "kept in pens" much like animals, before being "killed and baked".[52][53][54]
Missionaries and travellers report that human flesh was offered for sale at markets "in many parts of Nigeria".[44][55] According to clergyman and archdeacon George Basden, who spent more than 30 years in the country, in some southern regions, it had a well-established market price and was sold much like any other commodity; it usually came from war captives, kidnapped strangers, and purchased or bartered slaves.[56] While travelling near Onitsha around the year 1900, Basden found out that his servants and carriers had all repeatedly eaten human flesh. Once they were sure that he bore them no ill will, they talked freely about the custom, including their preferred body parts. He noted that they were "quite good-natured folk", with one of them later becoming "a much-respected evangelist".[47]
The consumption of kidnapped strangers or purchased slaves could hardly be due to hatred, and indeed the British anthropologist Charles Kingsley Meek found that the most frequent rationale he heard from cannibals or former cannibals in northern Nigeria was that human flesh was eaten "purely as meat". People did not want to waste an opportunity to eat good meat when they saw one, and the lives of enemies or outsiders were of no concern to them.[57] His colleague Percy Amaury Talbot [fr] observed the same among the Igbo and other inhabitants of southern Nigeria: human flesh was eaten because of a "great longing for meat". Most people considered meat a rare luxury and saw no reason to be squeamish about how they got it as long as it did not come from relatives or friends. Moreover, human flesh was preferred over that of animals for gastronomic reasons: it was considered the tastiest of all meats because of its "succulence" and sweetness (followed by monkey meat as second best). Young children were most appreciated, since "the younger the person, the tenderer are the 'joints'".[58][59]
King George Oruigbiji Pepple of the Kingdom of Bonny (ruled 1866–1883) embarrassed his British allies by "celebrat[ing] the anniversary of his father's death with a cannibal feast". When the British reproached him, he replied that he had merely upheld a time-honoured "custom of his country", also practised by his forefathers.[60]
"
"
Among the Maka people in southeastern Cameroon, eating strangers was once "quite normal", as the Dutch anthropologist Peter Geschiere learned from various old informants who remembered this custom from their youth.[61] Eating one's own kin, however, was strictly taboo and considered a "very evil" act only committed by witches.[62]
In 1910, a young German rubber merchant was killed together with his cook, his concubine, and two porters, after they had wandered too far off the main road. "According to oral tradition and numerous witnesses ..., their bodies were cut into pieces and eaten" – the usual treatment of any non-kin enemy. The German colonial government reacted with a large-scale punitive expedition, in which various Maka villages were burned and all their inhabitants, including women and children, were arrested.[63]
"
"
LYNNWOOD—Newly appointed Lynnwood City Council member Jessica Roberts’ now deleted alleged Reddit profile, Other_Ardvark_6105, dabbles in some dark fantasies including, but not limited to, s*xually assaulting women, cannibalizing them, and m*rder.
"
"
Cannibalism is consuming pop culture. What does it all mean?
Cannibalism is considered the most inhumane of activities. In the last year, however, films and TV shows like Bones And All, Fresh, Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story, House of Hammer, and Yellowjackets have forced viewers to grapple with the trope by digging into the metaphorical, social and political themes it may represent beyond all that body horror. What they’ve discovered is just how delicious cannibalistic themes can be when digging into capitalism, patriarchy, human connection and autonomy for those at the bottom of the food chain.
"
"
Why is "vore" an intrinsically misogynistic fetish?
For clarity's sake, I will herein define "vore" as: A fetish in which one derives a sexual thrill from the thought of eating or being eaten by another being, sometimes in graphic/violent detail, and sometimes by simply being swallowed whole. The latter is far more common.
I have been discussing this particular fetish with my friend group off and on for a while now. It is certainly a niche fetish, and fairly far outside of what society might consider normal or acceptable. But several friends articulated to me a concern about it that I had never considered. That being, that vore is intrinsically misogynistic. My friend group, and other people I've discussed this with, all seem to be in agreement that vore is very sexist, and even outright anti-feminist.
To articulate this point, people cite numerous instances of vore artwork of women being swallowed up by giant creatures. The fetish portrayed in such pictures is then literally fetishizing the death of women and the dissolution of the female body. It is a fetish for ending the existence of women. That seems to be a pretty cut and dry argument that proves vore is an inherently anti-feminist fetish.
However, a very large portion of those with this particular paraphilia are males who fetishize being consumed by a female entity, not the other way around. The same people holding to the above argument maintain that even if the prey is male and the predator female, that the vore fantasy is still, by its very nature, a very sexist and damaging fetish to have in terms of how it relates to women.
So, what are your thoughts? Even if a woman is not the victim in a person's vore fantasy, even if they are in fact the predator, is the very nature of the vore fetish itself inextricably misogynistic? If so, how and why? Is there a way for it not to be so, or is it something that is just utterly sexist and not salvageable? Is it even worth saving if it could be saved?
"
"
u/thetntm avatar
thetntm
•
2y ago
Just wanted to comment that as someone who has done quite a few deep dives into vore, you're absolutely right that there's a lot of vore that has that "misogynistic" edge to it, but when you dive deeper I think you come to realize that there's another couple of layers to it.
If you look deep enough, you can actually come across a ton of examples of MISANDRIST vore, often more common in written stories rather than artwork. A lot of these stories depict men living in a world where they are subject to extreme levels of sexism by women who basically dominate them entirely, often in a world without any rights at all.
Of course, these kinds of stories aren't written by sexist women trying to push their views of what the world should be. Almost all of these stories are probably written by horny men fantasizing about living in a world where women have absolute power over them.
Vore, just like BDSM, is a power fantasy. People into vore fantasize about having extreme power over others, or others having extreme power over them. And people who are into vore, more than anyone, understand that this kind of fantasy doesn't often depict what those people want in reality. Often, people into vore sexualize or fantasize about sexist, misogynistic, or misandrist behavior because it adds to that power dynamic that's already inherent in the fantasy. This doesn't reflect their views towards others, it's just part of the fantasy. Most vore enthusiasts would agree that they wouldn't actually eat someone or want to be eaten by someone in real life, though separating what you actually want vs what you fantasize about may be harder for some.
So that's where it comes from. If that makes you uncomfortable, maybe avoid those corners of the internet. But don't let what someone fantasizes about affect your opinions of them as a person, or let it make you jump to conclusions about their morality.
1
[deleted]
•
1y ago
viktor-nati0n
•
3mo ago
"
Added in 33 minutes 22 seconds:
A fetish of wanting to control what people do, like being a priest, a teacher, a parent, is all authoritarian fantasy, similar to consumption and being very closely bonded or completely "knowing" a person, which was used as a sexual term in the past and would involve going beyond any personal privacy or rights. The authoritarians are not on the extreme oposite ends of a spectrum but are the same people whether they espouse ideas associated with right or left wing politics, censorship, and total domination, and they share the same fetishes too. Also, even if a female character is depicted in power or doing something overpowering, that doesn't mean that the art is coming from a misandrist necessarily, as such things are misogynistic fantasies also and support the idea of the female character being threatening. It is like stupidly thinking that claims and stories regarding witches were feminist and misandrist because they claimed the women were attacking mothering by harming children and misandrist because of harming patriarchal family structures. Those stories associating maleficium or evil power or acts with and from women were not likely coming from human rights activists lol, but from people in societies where putting down female figures and many things associated with females was very normal and common, so that they were not making any waves by presenting a female monstrousity, which may have also been variously fetishized by people, and those fetishizing such things are usually still very much immersed in the same sort of thinking that the idea originated from with the negative or first approach and interpretation and reaction intended, but then they go a little further, and in many cases when fetishizing a powerful "other", there is the sense of re-dominating or conquering and domesticating them by being desired by them or being positive about the interaction, even if it appears that something negative has happened in the depiction, as it is common to see that there is pleasure intended for certain viewers at the sight of the consumption and the consumed has been desired and accepted, so a "win" for them if the person viewing also links themselves to that person and their position.
Utilitarianism "it is just meat, why waste it", and many other factors play into why certain people who are extreme authoritarians end up connecting to cannibalistic fantasies or acts, but what is happening in every case of such by definition is something is being overpowered, even if they asked for such for themselves and so are some of the force behind ehat happens and may feel power in the knowledge of people doing whatever they ask for.
Re: The rise of the right
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2026 11:00 am
by kFoyauextlH
No error with the keyboard occurred here. It appears that it may not have occurred because of a lack of videos and reddit posts and thjngs that load themselves in separate little boxes on the page being on this first page here.
Anyway, the "right" is pivoting slightly to try to pretend that they weren't just recently supporting vicious actions going on and are trying to gather more people who have become displeased by certain ethnic groups linked to those actions: