This is super annoying, besides the annoying voice, the jerk arrogant Europeans put people in danger and then cry about it, the loser woman exploits decency and defends them, the whole video is full of despicable sh*t!
This pointless colonial bullsh*t from the past should be done, no more stepping on the backs of people or shooting lions just to cheer oneself, how pathetic, s*ck f*cks, this annoyed me so much anyone who has been to Everest should be counted as a war criminal piece of sh*t and kicked into a ditch, their reward.
Re: Ethno-regional bias in Children's Films.
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2026 10:27 am
by kFoyauextlH
Re: Ethno-regional bias in Children's Films.
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2026 6:14 am
by kFoyauextlH
I think YouTube might cater to really young people, like one really big children's film:
Re: Ethno-regional bias in Children's Films.
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2026 10:05 am
by kFoyauextlH
The guy who made the video is getting on a lot of nerves.
This guy's voice appears again here:
Here is a monstrous racist advocating for mass murder of various people on a regular basis now saying no:
The voice of the guy in the accusative videoS seem sort of put on and bothers me, and the points being made seem to fall short for many people. The Japanese are definitely racist generally, but the racism of some people who are much more involved, influencial, and the way it manifests can seem much worse, like J and European and American racists, but most of the world seems to be generally pretty racist and having adopted European racism and colorist views, mixing them in some cases with prior classism and caste tupe things and older forms of prejudice and bias, and aldo re-reading things and injecting back into things new racism.
Anyone who views people as people is probably for the most part fine, but it seems ever more openly exposed and giving the impression of widespread prevalence spreading further through exposure to the internet by young prople as they are developing, that racism is pretty out of hand, and Sniper Wolf is not the problem, and actually suggesting that she must look like a stereotype to "represent" a certain people mentioned in passing is the more racist and damaging idea probably.
Creating people who think they don't look right by showing them rare, unusual, out of place faces that maybe look more like populations from elsewhere? I eonder if that does something to people growing up seeing nothing they can relate to in the mirror. It also probably doedn't help yo show very or especially un-ideal seeming people and suggest "that looks like you people", so both ways eould be wrong snd potentially damaging psychologically.
The modern attack, run by the intelligence community again as their population is obsessed with "monkeys" and "blackface" for some reason, is also aimed at sexualizing the image and objectifying "unnatural" looking dark skinned images applied to females with mostly caucasian features or hints, but either way it was never going to be a good idea, it is just more alienation from an endlessly mad and malicious source, and the campaign is full blown all over the internet and companies with ties directly to intelligence community projects and the military industrial complex.
