IndieAgora

Maybe you might not think it relevant here, but this is probably being sold as some kind of therapeutic device, and it devours conversation, and will no doubt be used in nefarious ways:



Pretending to read thoughts is a major step in thought policing, but then it goes further in suggesting people are thinking certain things and insisting and making them think things too. They want control over motor functions also and have "therapeutic" devices for that too, so that replacing people with easy to control machines entirely and making them totally dependent on machines for what they are credited for writing, then that they can't even think for themselves, and it very rapidly goes towards the person not even being there, totally swallowed up by something else, after already being falsified through superimposed medicalized and pop psychologizing.

Supposed solutions for rare issues effecting only a tiny proportion of anyone ever, that will be used far more broadly to harm as many as possible. That is why those people familiar with technology who work incessantly towards handing over governments and dangerous agencies and organizations technologies need to be stopped as though they are terroristic enemies to the human population, because as much as they are pretending to help one or two people with some problem, they are handing over things to terrible people and are exclusively in the know as to how to work them and make more, so they themselves are like lethal weapons with their knowledge and expertise. The villainous tyrants of this world don't need more weapons and an even further imbalance of power.

The lag issue caused a double post of the above post, so I replaced it with this text. This occurred on the forum site. Currently both are experiencing lag issues, but I've still been able to post, just slower.

Sort of connected, since those terms were meant to heal social issues with psychological impact on people, or that was the claim, so it seems at least closely connected or adjacent to the ideas here too.

This isn't autism at all as far as I can tell, or not at least what it would have been, there is so much language involved in this where language and processing should be an issue if anyone us sticking to the meaning, but they treat it like a catch-all now, and totally fine or abnormal in other ways people hijack and claim to define what it is, depriving so many people with much more serious language and motor difficulties from attention and care, and they are basically pretty horrible people for doing that.

This self-directing seems much more like psychopathy and similar things to that, personality disorders like Borderline Personality Disorder and things where people are consciously and carefully curating their image and being controlled and fake, whereas a proper autistic person I'd expect would either not know or be able to control or regulate themselves well, don't have a dictatorial and bullying inner voice necessarily obsessed with control and image, but in their obliviousness would fully just say and ask whatever innocently or even repeatedly and without holding back even if it seems so awkward, amd they wouldn't be expected to have perfect and precise inflection. These modern "autistics" are appropriators of disabilities, they are charlatan frauds even trying to profit from it by peddling misinformation and perpetuating a new set of total lies and myths they are trying to normalize and get as many people making similar false claims to deflate everything and the people with real problems are the ones deprived and most likely to suffer from the diversion.

Psychopathic people are known to, and it is a common trope that they practice making faces and speaking and all kinds of superficiality and manipulation and trying to be perceived in certain ways, while autistics were at least traditionally specifically bad at all that, they didn't know how they were coming off, they didn't know how certain things would sound or think about it at the time, so they frequently would come off as odd and awkward, besides often looking odd and moving oddly too because of weird motor issues and neurological issues. Even before such things were included, the Autistics were people who could scarcely communicate at all and were lost inside themselves, which is what the term was meant to refer to, but then it was expanded to include people who have certain difficulties, but now they've taken it to include psychopaths and superhumans who are social experts and master manipulators, so the term is meaningless with that much included and so many claimants applying the term to themselves, just whoever wants to be thought of as somehow different, yet if enough claim it, it becomes the norm and not different at all, so they will need to find something initially less trendy to claim, and then that will start becoming a trend.

I'm skilled in speech and motor skills also, and just about everything, except I refuse to do anything much, so that is my main difference between these supposedly disabled go-getters-good-at-everything-but-good-for-nothing types and myself, they are extremely skilled and even make use of it, while I am extremely skilled and make no use of it. They claim disabilities they clearly don't have, while I deny disabilities while laying in bed unable to move much.



Looks like I'm an autism denialist, at least for some or now a lot of these people. What is the difference between them and anyone else "normal"? Yeah, it tends to piss people off and irritate them when you do everything like they do and claim to be different, special, and worthy of special consideration, and even worse and more infuriating when the supposed handicapped person seems to be getting ahead and doing better and is extremely skilled in all the ways that they by definition should not be! Then they seem like total jerks, saying that they are special and different.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autistic_supremacism