How I picture what Derrida and Foucault are saying [video]

[atreestump]

You may have to switch to a browser to view this video if you are using Tapatalk.

[vid=MP4]https://ontic-philosophy.com/videos/how-i-picture-derrida-foucault.mp4[/vid]

It may be best to pause the video to read what is on the screen.

So, after reading this: https://ontic-philosophy.com/attachment.php?aid=53 I would like to say that I percieve Differance as Kether in Kabballah. Namely:

Derrida's notion of differance may be likened to the notion of time-travel: when considered in the abstract it is interesting and meaningful in the sense that one can talk about it, but when considered in the concrete it is unintelligible.

I read something of Crowley that describes the state of Ipssimus in the same sense, Crowley in many ways 'demystifies' religion, if you read him carefully enough, he plays a few tricks that many will attach metaphysics to that are always from beyond this world, but Crowley never evoked and philosophy is rife throughout his texts, lots of leg pulls too. His theorums are talking about intentions as magic, intentions of this world.

Anyway, enough of Crowley, that's just me trying to define what I have read so far.